Back to Packet Index

Tragic Report of Cruelty to Gifted

49
401-737-0180

THE NATlONAL FDUNDATlON FOR
GlFTED AND CREATlVE CHlLDREN
WARWICK. RHODE ISLAND 02886

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION- To be used at the discretion of the National Foundation for Gifted and Creative Children.

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:

RE:
D.O.B. 3/4/72
D.O.T. 6/29/81

I am going to write a report on one of the most tragic cases of cruelty to gifted children. For those who view me as one whose opinions "do not hold water" I want to say that I hold myself fully capable and responsible for this report. Since I have been requested to review manuscripts that are being written by a prestigious publish- ing house, I would hope that this state begin to know that I indeed, am aware of the consequences of the neglect of our most sensitive and gifted children. While (Mrs. X) requested some testing on her son, I did not have to see tests to know that she has a very gifted boy who has been totally mishandled, miseducated and misunderstood.

When I met and spoke to (x) I knew this boy had been hurt very deeply because of ignorance and prejudices. His mother has also been subjected to humiliation in her fervent attempts to encourage more under- standing of her boy's needs. This report will be more than test scores and numbers. I have observed (x), studied the case history and had parental input. What has happened to this boy is criminal. There are hundreds of books on the gifted that warn educators and parents of what can happen to a gifted child if his needs are not met. Every negative thing in the books seems to have hit this boy. I regret that I did not meet before this time. Nine is the critical age and he has lost so much of his most precious years. Our state leaders have said that I become too emotional when I speak of the gifted -- no, after what I have seen this summer in numerous cases. I say that I have been much too quiet. It is a case like (x) that makes me wonder what has the foundation done in these past many years. Why has this state ignored what we have been saying? I will say that I have re-newed energy to fight for the rights of these children and I will not be as nice as I have been for these past 18 years. This state is one that should be investigated for its prejudices and continued rejection of those children we need the most. I hope that will be spared any future groups where he will feel alietared and rejected. He has suffered enough. Why has he suffered? Because he was born different and we live in a country where this is no crime against the state! Or do we?

-2- RE:

had all the characteristics of the gifted child -- his mother noted this while he was still a baby. He appears to fit the Terman type gifted child as well as one with a great deal of creative potential. It becomes obvious that began to regress as soon as he was in a group situation. This is why we urge parents to become experts and not allow this to happen. Gifted children are super sensitive and when they have a high IQ they have a logical kind of thinking that makes them want to please and to fit in. When they find this is not possible they develop mental health problems. A long time ago when I put my boy in kindergarten and no one would listen to me, he had re- gussed so much in his mental well being only after six months. Yet, had read and knew so much about the gifted. All the school people told me was what every book said "this is poison for the gifted child'. I tried to have this organization so that other gifted children would be assisted. This state is bad -- they even ignored a mandate for the gifted and yet always aTpropriated monies to house our emotionally dis- turbed gifted! How long will we allow our heads of state to ignore this problem! If we apply all we know about the gifted, I know many people would be out of business. A great deal of money is made because of distraught parents seeking solutions that are denied them.

I knew by talking to (x) that he was unhappy. We do not like to test such a child. No tests are valid when a child is not feeling good about himself. We did, however, administer tests to this boy. To test for brain dysfunction, the Memory-For-Designs Test and Simkov Perceptual Organization Inventory are used. The reason why Dr. Stanley Krippner selected these tests is that he found so many very gifted children being drugged and negatively labeled. (x) produced excellent scores -- there appears to no problem whatsoever. He excels in visual-motor skills. I note that his mother reports that he'd been given drugs to make him more docile in the classroom. She claims that the principal of the school suggested this. I consider this against the law. When we have to drug a child because we do not make room for his individuality, we are no longer a free country. This drugging of gifted children that started in the state of Rhode Island is one of the ugliest things we will have to live with. This organization had a crew of lawyers from the Harvard Law Center who were ready to go to court on behalf of many children who were illicitly drugged, but the politics of the state prevented this. I hope that Mrs. (X) will retrace her steps and let it be known that this suggestion should be confronted. She may save another gifted child. In her case, she had the good sense to know the principal was wrong, but there are too many cases where the parents have done as the school personnel suggested. The drugging of gifted children will go down in history as one of the most tragic wastes of this century.

Creativity is energy. Children who appear to have enormous amounts of energy often are gifted. This is not to be seen as impulsive. When these children are given tasks in which they are interested they will not be bored. Many of the gifted require some one to one teaching be- cause of their ability to grasp concepts quickly. We consider our creativity test evaluated Torranceas one of the best lndicators of how many children may have preferred ways of learning. (x) was given the Torrance Test of Creative Thinking (Figural). On this test the child is asked to embellish upon a figure and attach a picture to the flgure he has thus drawn. There are four categories measured; fluency, flexibility, originality and elaboration. (x) received above average scares in elaboration, high average in flexibillty and originality and average in fluency. Dr. Torrance did not feel that these scores are valid.

RE:
-3-

He wrote that the subject "may not have really warmed up. Shows rare flashes of creative thinking but is not consistent and lacks persistence. Might try Form B some time when he is better motivated".

(x) appeared to be hostile to anything at all that might re- semble school work. In spite of this he did receive some very strong creative strengths. A high elaborator is one who requires a great deal of time to learn a subject. When the student learns in this way he should be allowed to go into the learning in depth. To cut him off is to cause some deep frustrations. I have found that the gifted child with the high IQ sees many relationships when he studies a subject. He has a flood like mind and wants to go into the fullness of the area of learning. However, most schools cater to the child with the spot-like mind and who can stay in the more narrow concept of learning. Of course we know that the gifted child must study what he is interested in or we cut his life off. By capitalizing on his particualr interest, he will feel valued and will have the discipline to study other things as well.

On the checklist of creative strengths we find the following:

Atticulateness in telling story; context, environment +
Movement and action +
Combination of two or more sets of lines +
Internal visual perspective +
Extending/breaking boundaries/penetrating lines +
Richness of imagery +

The child who breaks boudaries will cause trouble to the teacher who is traditional. Very often because the child has original thought on an idea, he will be seen as one whose spirit we must break. Every time I write a report about a boy like (x) I always want to say what Eric Erickson has said:

Someday, maybe. there will exist a
well-informed, well-considered and
yet fervent public conviction that
the most deadly of all possible sins
is the mutilation of a child's spirit.

I hope that (x)'s love of learning will be rekindled. He has much to offer the world but we have not given him a chance.

To measure verbal intelligence, Form A and Form B of the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test were administered. This individually admin- istered test correlates well with longer tests of mental ability. An average is taken to insure greater reliability. received a score of that of a very rapid learner. This places him in the 95%ile. I was amazed that Mrs.(X) had her boy tested and they did find he had a high IQ. Why did this not do something for the boy? What good is it to test a child if the results are not to benefit him? My suggestion to the parents of (x) is to remove him from any hostile teacher or group and allow him to be tutored. The tutor should have some expertise in the psychology and education of the gifted. (x) needs very little repetition in his academic program. His behavior during our examination indicated the need for the establishment of rapport before he will do his best work. This boy needs a warm,pleas- ant human relationship before he will work well on academic tasks.

-4-

Any one who teaches should take special note of his sen- sitiVity and develop a gentle and kind attitude toward this student.

The Rogers Personal Adjustment Inventory and the Purcell Incomplete Sentences were given to (x) -to evaluate his mental health. The Rogers Inventory is in questionnaire form and attempts to measure one's extent of personal inferiority, social maladjustment, family maladjustment, and excessive daydreaming. The Purcell Sentences are projective in nature; they require a child to complete a phrase. re- flecting his own feelings (e.g.,. I wish my father....".

(x) has a very low self-esteem. This is not to be confused with ego strength. The gifted child maintains a sense of self even though he may have the self-hatred. This is why so many creative children develop serious problems. When we thwart creativity we en- courage delinquency or psychosis. This is a boy who feels alienated, who feels a failure and who said he has no friends. One of the reasons why the experts urge that the gifted child be with others like himself is to prevent this strong feeling of alienation from the group.

Of deep concern to us is his very high escape level. (x) finds his real world intolerable; he seeks solace in his dream world. When a child finds an inability to succeed, he is bewildered. The bright child wants to know himself; he needs to have a meaning for living.

Even though the family score is average, the total score is in the unsatisfactory range. This is why we must try to change (x)'s learning environment. If he is to be subjected to more of the "tyranny of the group" I feel his problems will increase.

In (x)'s replies to the Purcell Sentences we quote some of his feelings:

I DON'T KNOW WHY.......I cry over silly things.
IF NO ONE HELPS ME?.....I will just burst
SOME TEACHERS....are nice and some are not -- most are mean.
I HOPE I'LL NEVER .....be in a war
IT MAKES ME MAD.....when there are wars.
I AM HAPPY WHEN....I sleep out alone-relax and read a book
MOST PEOPLE DON'T KNOW.... that I am very sensitive
I'M TIRED OF....school work
IN A FIGHT ....kids pick on me I don't have real friends
I AM GOOD AT .... doing things with nature--I must learn by myself.
I BELIEVE THAT....killing is the worst thing in life.

(x) is a peace lover. This is found in much of the research. Some of these children will not fight back and this boy is one of them. He will want a friend who is very fair and trustworthy. He sees through that which is not falr. Many of our gifted worry about war and killing. This is a very sensitive boy and a very mature boy. If he has not made a good friend it is because he hasn't had the chance. Torrance has written about this in many of his writings.

Mrs.(X) did mention that (x) did very well while with a partlcular teacher. In almost every case history we have we have found that while the child has hated school and teachers for the most part, there usually has been one teacher whom he loved.

RE:
-5-

In a study on gifted children, they were asked if they were given a choice what would they want the most in their learning situation. The majority of these youngsters said; "for the teacher to love me."

This is one way we could give immediate relief to the gifted. A caring and knowing school administrator might find the teacher that is not threatened by the presence of the gifted child and give this teacher a class of the gifted. When people tell me we need money to have programs for the gifted, I cannot agree. I feel the change of attitude is something money cannot buy. One of the things about the gifted is the great need for democratic home and school environments. They will resist blind authority but will respond to reasonable kinds of discipline.

The gifted child requires time to have incubation periods. This does not mean he is lazy; he requires this time for personal reflection. I really do not believe that we will have learning situations for the gifted until we have a differentiated curricular and methods. Torrance has found that an open ended learning environment is essential for the children who have original thought. This is where the emphasis is on the child, democracy, inventiveness, process oriented, and where the materials and methods can be chosen by the teacher or the pupil. In such a situation, there is a great deal of room for creative learning.

The closed structure that is usually present in our traditional schools is oriented towards the teacher, product, rigidity, conformity and convergent thinking. In such a classroom there is little room for the deviant thinker. Perhaps now that we see our schools in crisis, the parents will be valued more and there will be a closer communication between family and school. This is necessary -- parents want the best for their children and teachers should want the same. I am aware that to be the parent of the gifted is difficult. The same is true of the school. But, if the schools admit that the gifted need special help. perhaps whole communities might become involved. We have to have the problem in the open. Community mentors are important if we are to give more than lip service to the gifted.

If this organization can be of assistance in the life of (x) we will be happy to expand upon our ideas. We have had vast experience with children like (x) and we want to share our knowledge. I could write on and on about these children. I also have the deepest empathy for the frustrated parents. Guess one has had to have experienced some- thing to really understand what another is suffering. Mrs. (X) is gifted and sensitive herself. She should have been listened to-- a mother knows her child.

I believe that there is mention of (x) being kept back in his grade. This would be a devastating blow to his already hurt self. I see the school as failing the child; not the child failing the school. Careful thought should be given to all and any decisions made in this boy's future schooling. I hope that (x) will be able to have some personal and academic success in his present school year.

Sincerely,
Marie Friedel
Exec. Dir.